🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to protect women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for further review if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple European countries
• The European treaty mandates particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in other EU countries